Materials and methods
A total 683 pediatric patients aged below 15 years treated for UTI from January 2012 to December 2017 were included in this study. Patients were divided into five age groups (<6 months, 6–12 months, 12–24 months, 24–60, and ≥60 months). Pathogenic strains were grouped as E. coli or non-E. coli according to Gram staining, and E. coli group was subdivided into ESBL(+) and ESBL(-) groups depending on whether the bacteria could produce extended spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL).
UTI was confirmed by body temperature greater than 38℃ using a tympanic thermometer, urine leukocytes of more than 10 per high power field view on microscopy, and colony count of pathogen at more than 10
5 colonies/mL of single organism on urine culture study. When two or more strains were cultured, the cases were excluded from this study [
7-
9].
Urine was collected in a sterilized urine bag or plastic cup after cleaning the urethral orifice area with 2% boric acid. For microscopic examination, urine samples were centrifuged and Gram stained to observe urinary bacteria and leukocytes. For culture study, 0.001 mL urine was inoculated into blood agar medium and MacConkey agar medium separately and incubated at 37℃ for 18–24 hours. The number of bacterial colonies per 1 mL was then calculated [
10]. Minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) to the strain was determined using VITEK2 (Bio-Merieux), a microbial automation device according to the Clinical and Labora tory Standards Institute (CLSI). Bacteria, more than 10
5 colonies/mL were considered to be significant as causative agents of UTI.
The antibiotic resistance of E. coli strains was analyzed. Resistance rate was expressed as {(Intermediate+Resistance)/(Susceptible+Intermediate+Resistance)} for each susceptible, intermediate, and resistant strain to each antibiotic. Bacterial strains with moderate susceptibility in antibiotic sensitivity tests were classified as resistance.
Collected data were analyzed using SPSS 18.0 program. Differences according to gender and age groups were evaluated using Chi-square and t tests. In order to evaluate the difference in incidences among the age groups, goodness of fit was determined by Chi-square test, and cross-tabulation analysis was done to establish significant differences in the incidence of UTI, by gender among the age groups. Statistical significance was considered when P value was less than 0.05.
Discussion
Among the 683 pediatric cases diagnosed with UTI at our institute from 2012 to 2017, 64.9% were male and 35.1% were female. This is similar to previous studies showing a higher prevalence in male children including neonatal period, and higher incidence in females after childhood, except for those aged above 50 years [
11]. High incidence rate of UTI in lower age groups of male might be due to poor penile hygiene during diaper wearing period. Current study indicated the prevalence of UTI in females was lower than that of males in early childhood, but then increased with age: from 24.2% in age <6 months, to 58.2% in age >5 years (
Table 1).
Several investigators have reported that pathogens of UTI are mainly enterobacteria, including
E. coli and
Enterobacteriaceae. Hooton and Stamm have reported that in the United States,
E. coli ,
Staphylococcus, Enterococcus, and other Gram-negative organisms account for 75-90%, 5–15%, and 5–10% of all UTI, respectively [
12]. In the present study, the ratio of
E. coli was highest at 77.2%, followed by
Klebsiella at 10.7% and
Enterobacter at 4.0%, showing that the portion of Gram-negative bacterial infections other than
E. coli should be taken into account [
13,
14]. UTI is mostly caused by ascending route through colonization and propagation of pathogens of lower gastrointestinal tract to perineum, urethral opening, inside urethra, then finally to the kidney [
1]. Consequentially, most common causative organism of UTI is
E. coli , while non-
E. coli cases account for about 10-35% [
15-
17]. We have a similar result of non-
E. coli UTI at 23%, whilst a domestic study reported 32.9% [
18].
We investigated the frequency of ESBL-producing ESBL(+)
E. coli strains. UTI caused by ESBL(+)
E. coli has been increasing in numbers for the last 6 years. The average prevalence rate of ESBL(+)
E. coli was 24.0% in this study, which is lower than those of foreign reports, at 33–69%. However, the incidence has increased up to 36.5% in 2017, drawing more attention for ESBL(+) E.coli infections. It was also found that 113 out of 463 patients were ESBL(+) at the time of their first visit, which led to estimate the community prevalence rate of ESBL(+) uropathogen to be around 24.4% in children (
Table 8).
In this study, antibiotics with resistance rates below 10% were amikacin, cefoxitin, ertapenem, imipenem, piperacillin/tazobactam, tigecycline, and nitrofurantoin. Third- and fourth- generation cephalosporin such as cefepime (23.7%) and cefotaxime (26.9%) showed relatively low resistance rates, whereas ESBL(+) E. coli showed high resistance rate to third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin such as cefepime (99.2%) and cefotaxime (99.2%). However, a considerably low resistance rate was displayed against carbapenem series antibiotics such as ertapenem (0.0%) and imipenem (0.0%). For E. coli not producing ESBL, it seems reasonable to consider third- and fourth-generation cephalosporin as the first line antibiotics. For patients with ESBL(+) E. coli cultured or serious clinical conditions, carbapenem series might need to be considered initially.
Nationally, the common regime for UTI treatment is to give empirical antibiotics firstly right after diagnosis, and to discharge the patient or schedule the next visit, if there are apparent clinical improvements for a few days. After completing two weeks of antibiotics administration, the patient will come and receive tests for confirming successful treatment. At times, the patient is informed late that he or she had ESBL(+) bacterial infection, even though the final follow-up tests are normal: no clinical sign, urine culture negative, and no pyuria. For such cases, we should pay close attention to prevent incomplete treatment or recurrence of UTI.
Throughout the current cases, the recurrence rate of UTI between ESBL(+) and ESBL(-) patients showed no significant difference (
Table 8), but greater in patients with vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Severity of VUR did not affect the recurrence (
Table 9).
In Korea, antibiotics are occasionally prescribed for treating simple pediatric febrile illnesses at primary care institutions, and this may lead to increases in antibiotic resistance of bacteria and also to more serious renal damage, due to delayed or incomplete treatment in those misdiagnosed UTI as simple pharyngitis or acute otitis media. It was acknowledged that susceptibility of E. coli to third- or fourth- generation cephalosporin was higher than that to ampicillin or amoxicillin/clavulanic acid. Also, ESBL(+) E. coli showed higher resistance rate to third- or fourthgeneration cephalosporin than ESBL(-) E. coli . As a result, empirical choice of antibiotics for UTI treatment may not be safe anymore due to increased frequency of ESBL(+) E. coil up to one quarter of the cases. Therefore, treatment guideline for UTI should be looked into, reflecting the recent findings of antibiotic resistance of pathogens and host characteristics.
Choosing antibiotics for UTI treatment will become more difficult as the incidence of ESBL(+) E.coli is becoming more common. The success rate of primary treatment with empirical antibiotics will be lowered, and, the renal damages will be more serious.
The number of research subjects was much reduced, because this study included single bacterium cultured cases exclusively. In order to obtain more accurate and useful information for UTI treatment, additional researches should be done through extension of research period and expansion of inclusion range of patients.