Recent key advances in the understanding of the pathogenesis of childhood minimal change disease

Article information

Child Kidney Dis. 2026;30(2):97-109
Publication date (electronic) : 2026 June 30
doi : https://doi.org/10.3339/ckd.26.014
1Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
Correspondence to Lei Yin Department of Nephrology, Shanghai Children’s Medical Center, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, 1678 Dongfang Road, Shanghai 200127, China E-mail: yinlei@scmc.com.cn
Received 2026 February 24; Revised 2026 May 16; Accepted 2026 June 8.

Abstract

Minimal change disease (MCD) is the leading cause of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children, accounting for >85% of cases in those aged 1–12 years. Although 80%–90% of patients achieve initial remission with glucocorticoids, steroid dependence or frequent relapses occur in 55%–60% of cases, necessitating prolonged immunosuppression. Long-term steroid exposure in children is associated with severe age-specific adverse events, including growth retardation, skeletal dysplasia, cataracts, and impaired vaccine responses from immunosuppression. Steroid resistance and chronic kidney disease may also develop in some patients. Recent clinical evidence and literature (2015–2025) have transformed our understanding of MCD from the traditional “single T cell-driven” hypothesis to a multidimensional interactive regulatory network. This network is based on coordinated T- and B-cell dysregulation, mediated by defined podocyte injury pathways and modulated by genetic and environmental factors. Distinct pediatric traits stem from immature immune system development and pediatric podocyte plasticity. In this review, we synthesize recent advances in these pediatric pathogenic mechanisms, delineate age-dependent differences between childhood and adult MCD, and propose a precision medicine framework for disease subtyping, noninvasive biomarker development, and targeted therapies. This work addresses critical unmet clinical needs in the long-term management of pediatric MCD.

Introduction

Childhood minimal change disease (MCD) accounts for >85% of cases of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome (INS) in children older than 1 year of age [1]. MCD is the most prevalent glomerular disease in pediatric nephrology practice, with a global incidence of 2–7 cases per 100,000 children. Although glucocorticoids remain the first-line therapy according to international clinical guidelines [2], and induce remission in most patients, steroid dependence, frequent relapses, and resistance remain pervasive and unresolved. For decades, the “circulating permeability factor” hypothesis (that MCD is driven by an extrarenal circulating factor) was prominent, but it failed to explain the striking age-related disparities in MCD, including differences in relapse rates (60%–70% among children aged 3–6 years vs. 40%–50% among older children), as well as markedly distinct therapeutic responses and long-term outcomes compared with adults with MCD (Table 1) [1-13].

Key differences between childhood and adulthood MCD

Recent advances in single-cell RNA sequencing, spatial immunofluorescence, and multi-omics technologies have led to the recognition of MCD as a multidimensional, three-layered pathogenic network (Fig. 1). In this model, immune dysregulation acts as the primary pathogenic driver layer, podocyte injury is the final pathological execution layer, and genetic and environmental triggers form the background regulatory layer that modulates network activity through extensive bidirectional crosstalk. The pediatric specificity of this network stems from dramatic functional shifts in the developing adaptive immune system and the distinct maturation kinetics of immune regulatory circuits compared with those in adults [5]. For example, pediatric regulatory T (Treg) cells exhibit 30%–40% less secretion of immunosuppressive cytokines, including interleukin (IL)-10 and transforming growth factor beta, than their adult counterparts, and such low secretion directly amplifies disease susceptibility in young children [4]. Monogenic and polygenic genetic variants, such as COL4A5 and specific human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQA1 haplotypes, further contribute to disease heterogeneity, particularly in steroid-resistant pediatric cases [10,11].

Fig. 1.

Multidimensional network model of childhood minimal change disease pathogenesis. This model is structured around two core interconnected functional modules, with its overall activity fine-tuned by cross-cutting developmental and background regulatory factors. (A) Driver layer (immune dysregulation), in which genetic susceptibility and environmental triggers collectively induce immune dysregulation, manifested as regulatory T cell defects, EFOB cell-T follicular helper cell activation, and pathogenic autoantibody production. These immune cells secrete cytokines (IL-13 and TNF-α) that act on podocytes. (B) Execution layer (podocyte injury), in which podocytes serve as core targets and signal integrators, and damage occurs via podocyte foot process fusion, cytoskeletal remodeling, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis. Extensive crosstalk exists between all mechanisms, such as autoantibody-mediated complement activation and mutual promotion between pyroptosis and ferroptosis. The entire network is inherently influenced by pediatric developmental specificity; its overall activity is modulated by genetic/epigenetic factors and gut microbiota-diet interactions that shape immune status and podocyte vulnerability. HLA-DQA1, human leukocyte antigen DQA1; NLRP3, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor pyrin domain-containing 3; EFOB, extrafollicular B; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; C5a, complement fragment 5a; C5b-9, complement membrane attack complex C5b-9; RhoA, Ras homolog family member A; ROCK, Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase; HDAC6, histone deacetylase 6; GSDMD, gasdermin D; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; SLC7A11, solute carrier family 7 member 11.

However, while most existing reviews on MCD have focused on data from adult and pediatric populations, few have addressed the developmental mechanisms underpinning the disease in children. To clarify how recent basic research advances can be applied to pediatric MCD care, this review focuses on these pediatric mechanisms within the three-layer network model.

Immune dysregulation: principal initiator of pediatric MCD

Immune dysregulation constitutes the core driver layer of the MCD pathogenic network, expanding from the historical narrow focus on intrinsic T-cell defects to a coordinated T-cell/B-cell dysfunctional axis. Because of pediatric immune plasticity, characterized by immature regulatory circuits and enhanced responsiveness to environmental triggers such as infections and allergens, this dysregulated immune response is pathogenic only in children.

T-cell subset dysregulation

The immunopathological processes underlying pediatric MCD arise from an imbalance among T-cell subsets, which is exacerbated by the age-dependent immaturity of immune regulatory circuits in children. Clinical data from multiple independent cohort studies have revealed a strong association between Treg-cell dysfunction and relapse risk in pediatric MCD [14]. In particular, a Japanese cohort study showed that, after steroid therapy, Treg-cell expansion was minimal in 128 patients with INS who had frequent relapses (24.8% increase from baseline) but substantial in patients without relapses (779.2% increase; P<0.001). Furthermore, a post-therapy Treg-cell increase of <400% presaged subsequent relapses with 94% sensitivity [4]. In a smaller European cohort (n=45), the sensitivity was slightly lower (89%), which may be attributable to differences in steroid dosing regimens and population-specific genetic backgrounds [14]; such differences would highlight the importance of population variability in pediatric MCD immune phenotypes.

This pediatric Treg-cell functional impairment stems primarily from overactivation of the mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1 (mTORC1). Elevated levels of phosphorylated ribosomal protein S6, a downstream phosphorylation target of mTORC1 signaling, inhibit FOXP3 promoter activity via phosphorylation of signal transducer and activator of transcription 3, thereby directly impairing Treg-cell maturation and functional stability [11]. In pediatric Treg cells, the FOXP3 locus undergoes dynamic epigenetic maturation throughout childhood. Promoter methylation levels are higher and transcriptional stability is lower in preschool-aged children than in adolescents; thus, the Treg cells of young children are more vulnerable to mTORC1-mediated dysfunction. Beyond Treg-cell dysfunction, pediatric MCD is characterized by a marked imbalance in the Treg-cell/T-helper 17 (Th17)-cell axis. Active disease is associated with the expansion of proinflammatory Th17 cells, which secrete IL-17A to directly induce podocyte actin cytoskeletal injury; together with pre-existing Treg-cell functional impairment, this creates a self-reinforcing pathogenic cycle [15]. The heightened propensity for Th17 polarization in response to infectious triggers is unique to the developing pediatric immune system and may be a mechanistic link between common childhood infections and MCD relapses.

T-follicular helper (TFH) cells also exhibit stage-specific alterations in pediatric MCD. Upregulation of inducible T-cell co-stimulator is observed in new-onset cases, whereas elevation of OX40 levels predominates during relapses. This difference reflects a transition from acute immune initiation to persistent memory immune response [6]. In allergy-associated MCD, which is disproportionately prevalent among preschool-aged children, TFH cell–derived IL-4 drives B-cell immunoglobulin E production, providing a key mechanistic link between atopy and MCD flares in the pediatric population [16]. These T-cell subsets directly engage podocytes in a bidirectional pathogenic loop. Treg-cell dysfunction reduces cytotoxic T lymphocyte–associated protein 4-mediated suppression of podocyte CD80 expression, which triggers activation of the nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3 (NLRP3) inflammasome and induces pyroptosis. Concurrently, TFH cell–derived IL-13 upregulates podocyte CD80 expression and initiates cytoskeletal damage mediated by Ras homolog family member A/Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase (RhoA/ROCK) signaling. Thus, a vicious cycle of amplification of immune activation and podocyte injury is created [16,17]. Multiple independent clinical cohort studies have validated the correlation between circulating Treg-cell frequency and function and long-term prognosis in pediatric MCD, further supporting the central role of Treg-cell impairment in disease progression [18].

EFOB-cell responses

Extrafollicular B (EFOB) cell activation is a defining pediatric feature of MCD pathogenesis and is tightly coupled to the upstream T-cell dysregulation described previously. In humoral immunity, a key developmental distinction between children and adults is that children younger than 5 years rely heavily on EFOB-cell responses because germinal center formation and function remain immature during early life. This developmental trait accounts for why EFOB-cell activation plays a far more prominent role in pediatric MCD than in adult MCD. Clinicians have observed a significant correlation between elevated circulating EFOB-cell counts and cow’s milk protein allergy in pediatric patients with MCD, particularly among children younger than 5 years. These findings support targeted dietary interventions in this subgroup, but large-scale randomized controlled trials are still needed to confirm causality [19].

In a landmark 2023 study involving 96 pediatric patients with INS, investigators identified marked expansion of EFOB cells and enhanced signaling through the type I interferon/pro­liferation-inducing ligand (APRIL) pathway during active disease, wherein EFOB-cell activation is fully dependent on CD4+ T-cell help and closely associated with circulating levels of IL-13 and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α), which are key Th2/Th1 cytokines in MCD [2]. Pediatric podocytes express 1.8-fold higher levels of CD80 than adult podocytes and are therefore significantly more sensitive to EFOB cell–derived IL-13-mediated injury. This is a key pediatric mechanism that exacerbates the downstream pathological effects of EFOB-cell activation [8]. The well-documented efficacy of the B cell–depleting agent rituximab in pediatric MCD further supports the central role of B cells in disease pathogenesis. Colucci et al. [13] observed elevated memory B-cell counts in pediatric patients with frequently relapsing MCD and demonstrated that repeated rituximab administration prolonged the duration of pediatric remission from 10 to 16 months. This outcome significantly outperformed that reported in adults with MCD (median remission duration, 8 months) [13,18]. At the molecular level, EFOB cell–derived IL-13 activates the classical complement pathway, whereas anti-nephrin antibodies secreted by memory B cells bind directly to podocyte slit diaphragms. Together, these mechanisms generate a synergistic “antibody–complement injury” effect in which upstream immune dysregulation leads to downstream podocyte damage [8,20,21].

Anti-podocyte slit diaphragm antibodies

The discovery of anti-podocyte slit diaphragm autoantibodies has revolutionized the understanding of MCD immunopathogenesis. The striking pediatric predominance distinguishes childhood from adult disease: approximately 30% of children with MCD, compared with only 15% of adults, test positive for anti-nephrin antibodies [22,23]. These pathogenic autoantibodies serve as a direct molecular bridge between adaptive immune dysregulation and podocyte injury, acting as critical effector molecules of the driver layer. Ichikawa et al. [24] confirmed immunoglobulin G–nephrin colocalization in 84% of glomeruli from pediatric patients with MCD, a finding that is correlated directly with proteinuria severity and resolves completely with disease remission.

Data regarding the prevalence of anti-nephrin antibodies in pediatric cohorts have been inconsistent. Watts et al. [22] reported a 30% positivity rate in a North American cohort (n=87), whereas Hengel et al. [23], using optimized spatial immunofluorescence assays, detected antibodies in 42% of a European cohort (n=113). These discrepancies probably stem from differences both in detection methods (immunoprecipitation vs. high-resolution spatial imaging) and in disease activity status at the time of sampling; thus, standardized and age-appropriate detection assays are urgently needed for clinical use. Age-stratified analyses reveal that anti-nephrin antibody prevalence is as high as 47% among preschool-aged children (aged 3–6 years), compared with only 22% among adolescents aged 13–18 years. This finding mirrors the age-related gradient in relapse risk observed in clinical practice. In steroid-resistant pediatric cases, 48.5% of patients harbor anti-nephrin or anti-podocin antibodies. Moreover, second-line immunosuppressants, such as rituximab, are effective in 92.3% of these autoantibody-positive patients but in only 20% of antibody-negative patients [20]. The direct pathogenicity of these antibodies is further evidenced by animal studies, in which injection of purified anti-nephrin antibodies from pediatric patients with MCD induced massive proteinuria in nude mice [21]. At the molecular level, these autoantibodies trigger production of robust reactive oxygen species in podocytes, which directly induces ferroptosis and activates the NLRP3 inflammasome to drive pyroptosis; thus, they are central mediators linking systemic autoimmunity to podocyte death in pediatric MCD [21,25].

Pyroptosis in pediatric MCD

NLRP3-mediated pyroptosis, a proinflammatory form of programmed cell death, plays a disproportionately prominent role in pediatric MCD because pediatric podocytes exhibit higher basal NLRP3 expression and greater sensitivity to oxidative stress than adult podocytes [9]. A 2024 study of 26 pediatric patients with MCD revealed significantly reduced podocyte density (9.75±0.66 vs. 17.96±0.83 in healthy controls) and elevated urinary levels of IL-18, a key downstream effector of pyroptosis; however, the strength of these findings is limited by the small sample size and lack of age-stratified analyses [9]. The underlying signaling cascade involves upregulated CD36-mediating oxidized low-density lipoprotein (ox-LDL) influx, which in turn activates the NLRP3/gasdermin D pathway to trigger pyroptotic cell death [9].

Standard steroid therapy reduces circulating ox-LDL and urinary IL-18 levels but fails to inhibit upstream CD36/NLRP3 activation in podocytes, which suggests that steroids target only the downstream inflammatory effects of pyroptosis. This limitation is a critical drawback for pediatric mechanism–targeted therapies. Pyroptosis participates in bidirectional crosstalk with the upstream driver layer. IL-18 released during pyroptosis upregulates transferrin receptor (TFRC) to expand podocyte iron pools (which exacerbates ferroptosis) and promotes IL-13 secretion by EFOB cells; this results in cyclic exacerbation of immune dysregulation and podocyte injury [9,25]. Moreover, C5a, a key complement-derived fragment, activates NLRP3 signaling via the podocyte C5aR, integrating complement signaling into this pathogenic loop [26]. Urinary levels of cleaved gasdermin D and IL-18 are promising biomarkers of pyroptotic activity in pediatric MCD that can be measured noninvasively. Their levels strongly correspond to disease activity and decline rapidly with treatment-induced remission.

Innate immune cells in pediatric MCD

Although adaptive immunity remains the core focus of research on MCD pathogenesis, accumulating evidence indicates that innate immune cells are key modulators of the pediatric MCD disease network, encompassing environmental triggers, adaptive immune activation, and podocyte injury. Because of the developmental immaturity of the innate immune system, which remains highly responsive to microbial and inflammatory stimuli throughout early childhood, the role of innate immune cells is disproportionately prominent in children.

Circulating levels of nonclassical CD16⁺ monocytes are elevated in the peripheral blood of pediatric patients with INS during active disease and normalize after disease remission [27]. These activated monocytes secrete high levels of proinflammatory cytokines including TNF-α and IL-1β, which contribute to the initiation and recurrence of minimal change nephrotic syndrome by inducing glomerular injury and proteinuria [28]. The M1/M2 polarization balance of renal-infiltrating macrophages is developmentally regulated in children. Younger children exhibit a greater propensity for proinflammatory M1 macrophage polarization in response to infectious stimuli, which further exacerbates glomerular injury. In pediatric MCD, viral or bacterial triggers activate plasmacytoid dendritic cells, which then produce large amounts of type I interferon that drive EFOB-cell activation and autoantibody production [2]. The heightened type I interferon response to viral stimuli in preschool-aged children provides a mechanistic explanation for the high rate of infection-triggered relapses observed in this age group. Type 2 innate lymphoid cells, activated by epithelium-derived cytokines (IL-25 and IL-33) in the context of allergy or infection, secrete large amounts of IL-13 and IL-4, which directly drive podocyte CD80 expression and cytoskeletal damage and promote B-cell production of immunoglobulin E [29]. The high level of activity of these lymphoid cells in early life is considered a key driver of the high incidence of allergy-associated MCD among preschool-aged children. Importantly, innate immune cells function not only as upstream drivers of adaptive immune dysregulation but also as direct responders to podocyte injury signals, forming a bidirectional crosstalk between the driver and execution layer of the disease network (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Bidirectional crosstalk between immune cell subsets and podocytes in childhood minimal change disease. This schematic diagram shows the core signaling interactions between adaptive immune cells (Treg cells, TFH cells, EFOB cell/memory B cells), innate immune cells (macrophages, pDCs, type 2 innate lymphoid cells), and podocytes. Immune cells secrete pathogenic cytokines and autoantibodies to induce podocyte injury, and injured podocytes release DAMPs and proinflammatory factors to recruit and activate immune cells; this process results in a vicious cycle of immune activation and podocyte injury. Treg, regulatory T; TFH, T-follicular helper; EFOB, extrafollicular B; IL, interleukin; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; pDCs, plasmacytoid dendritic cells; DAMPs, damage-associated molecular patterns.

Podocyte injury: executor of pathological processes

Podocyte injury serves as the final step in the execution layer of the MCD pathogenic network. Research since 2015 has expanded beyond the classical pathological hallmark of podocyte foot process fusion to include podocyte adhesion defects, cytoskeletal remodeling, and novel programmed cell death pathways (pyroptosis and ferroptosis). A defining feature of pediatric podocytes is their continued regenerative capacity, particularly in children younger than 8 years of age, which partially explains the higher remission rates and lower risk of irreversible renal function decline observed in younger patients than in adolescents and adult patients [7].

Podocyte adhesion defects

Integrin β1 (ITGB1) is the key adhesion molecule responsible for anchoring podocytes to the glomerular basement membrane (GBM), and its aberrant cytoplasmic localization—observed in 16.8% of adult podocytopathies—compromises podocyte–GBM adhesion in pediatric MCD and directly underpins podocyte foot process fusion and podocyte detachment [30]. ITGB1 expression in podocytes is developmentally regulated. Podocyte expression is notably reduced in children younger than 3 years compared with adolescents. Consequently, podocytes in young children are inherently more vulnerable to adhesion defects and detachment. High glucose and IL-13 levels activate the urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor/plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 pathway linked to ITGB1 endocytosis in animal models; however, its role in human pediatric MCD remains incompletely understood. In a small pilot study (n=12), researchers failed to detect overexpression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor in pediatric MCD kidney biopsy samples, in contrast to adult samples [31]. This finding further highlights key age-related differences in the mechanisms underlying podocyte adhesion defects.

Reduced podocyte–GBM adhesion activates multiple stress-response pathways. Integrin β5 (ITGB5)/focal adhesion kinase pathway activation drives pyroptosis, whereas acyl-coenzyme A synthetase long-chain family member 4 (ACSL4)-linked ferroptosis represents another critical injury mechanism triggered by adhesion loss [25,32]. The interplay between these pathways in pediatric podocytes must be explored further because current data are extrapolated largely from adult or animal models. The pediatric-specific expression patterns of ITGB subunits (e.g., ITGB1 and ITGB5) across different age groups remain uncharacterized.

Cytoskeletal remodeling

The actin cytoskeleton is the core of podocyte structure and filtration function, and its dysregulation is a universal hallmark of podocytopathies [33]. In pediatric MCD, TFH cell–derived IL-13 mediates cytoskeletal disorganization in podocytes by downregulating synaptopodin and α-actinin-4, two key actin-stabilizing proteins, while simultaneously activating RhoA/ROCK signaling to promote actin depolymerization [7,17]. Synaptopodin expression in podocytes increases progressively with age. As preschool-aged children (aged 3–6 years) have considerably lower levels than older patients, their podocyte cytoskeletons are inherently less stable and more sensitive to inflammatory injury. The RhoA/ROCK signaling pathway is more sensitive in preschool-aged children than in older children, although this assertion awaits validation in age-stratified clinical studies.

Histone deacetylase 6 (HDAC6) overactivation further contributes to cytoskeletal dysfunction in pediatric MCD through deacetylation of α-tubulin, disruption of microtubule stability, and impairment of autophagic flux in podocytes [34]. HDAC6 may synergize with RhoA/ROCK signaling to exacerbate podocyte injury, but this interaction remains unconfirmed in primary human podocytes. HDAC6 inhibitors (e.g., tubastatin A) have shown promise in preclinical studies, but rigorous validation in pediatric cohorts is needed. In addition, because HDAC6 plays critical roles in neuronal development, its use in children younger than 5 years old raises safety concerns about toxicity [34].

mTORC1 dysregulation

Hyperactivation of mTORC1 is a key component of podocyte injury in pediatric MCD, driven primarily by reduced expression of DNA repair enzymes in developing podocytes, which leads to increased DNA damage and subsequent mTORC1 activation [5]. Preclinical studies have shown that rapamycin, an mTORC1 inhibitor, improves podocyte health and reduces DNA damage in Ercc1-knockout mice. However, it fails to reduce established proteinuria, indicating that mTORC1 inhibition alone is insufficient to reverse advanced podocyte injury [5]. Such a cross-module signaling molecule integrates both immune and podocyte pathogenic pathways: mTORC1 inhibits Treg-cell differentiation in the driver layer, and TFRC is upregulated to promote podocyte ferroptosis in the execution layer. In this way, the entire pathogenic network is reinforced [8,11,25]. During kidney development, mTORC1 plays a critical physiological role in regulating podocyte growth and maturation, and its dysregulation in children thus not only causes acute injury but also disrupts normal podocyte developmental programming, a mechanism unique to the pediatric population.

Ferroptosis in pediatric MCD

Ferroptosis, an iron-dependent form of regulated cell death driven by lethal lipid peroxidation, is pathogenic in children, resulting from the immaturity of systemic iron metabolism and the developmental characteristics of pediatric podocytes. The core regulatory axis of ferroptosis comprises TFRC-mediated iron overload, ACSL4-mediated lipid peroxidation, and glutathione peroxidase 4/solute carrier family 7 member 11 (GPX4/SLC7A11)-mediated antioxidant defense. This axis has been well characterized in podocyte injury across multiple glomerular diseases [25]. In the context of MCD, in vitro studies have confirmed that IL-13 and complement C5b-9 can trigger ferroptosis in podocytes by inhibiting SLC7A11 activity, a key component of the system Xc cystine/glutamate antiporter [24,26].

Children, particularly preschool-aged children, are vulnerable to ferroptosis because of developmental factors. Rapid growth increases intestinal iron absorption, which causes systemic iron availability to increase, and immature podocytes express higher levels of TFRC and have weaker antioxidant capacity than do mature adult podocytes. Oxidative stress, which is more severe in active pediatric MCD, inhibits nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2, a transcription factor, downregulating its downstream targets heme oxygenase-1 and GPX4 to further promote ferroptosis [35,36]. Cross-activation between ferroptosis and pyroptosis creates a self-reinforcing vicious cycle of podocyte injury. Lipid peroxides derived from ferroptosis activate the NLRP3 inflammasome to drive pyroptosis, whereas complement C5b-9 inhibits SLC7A11 to exacerbate ferroptosis [24-26]. This mutually reinforcing pathogenic network highlights the need for multitarget therapeutic strategies in pediatric MCD, as inhibition of a single pathway may be insufficient to disrupt the vicious cycle of podocyte injury and death.

Mechanisms of glucocorticoid resistance in pediatric MCD

Glucocorticoid resistance represents one of the most critical clinical challenges in pediatric MCD and is associated with an increased risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD), treatment-related adverse events, and long-term morbidity. The mechanisms underlying steroid resistance are tightly linked to abnormalities across all three layers of the MCD pathogenic network. Their distinct immunophenotypic and molecular characteristics differ between steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome (SSNS) and steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) in children with MCD.

Within the immune driver layer, children with SRNS-MCD exhibit more severe and persistent Treg-cell dysfunction, whereby FOXP3 expression is lower and immunosuppressive capacity is more impaired than in patients with SSNS-MCD; this dysfunction cannot be reversed by standard steroid therapy [15]. Moreover, in patients with SRNS, expansion of proinflammatory Th17 cells persists. Elevated IL-17 levels promote podocyte injury and steroid resistance via activation of the nuclear factor kappa B signaling pathway. Within the B-cell compartment, although anti-nephrin antibodies are present in both pediatric SSNS and SRNS, antibody titers are higher and anti-podocin and other anti-podocyte slit diaphragm autoantibodies are more prevalent in patients with SRNS [20,21]. The presence of these autoantibodies augurs a favorable response to second-line immunosuppressants (such as rituximab) even in steroid-resistant patients; thus, immunophenotyping is important for treatment stratification [20].

In the execution layer, podocyte-intrinsic abnormalities are a core cause of steroid resistance, independent of upstream immune dysregulation. Monogenic pathogenic variants are a well-established mechanism. Approximately 25% of pediatric patients with SRNS-MCD carry pathogenic genetic variants, most commonly in COL4A5, NPHS2, and NPHS1, which encode key structural proteins of the podocyte slit diaphragm and cytoskeleton [10,11]. These genetic defects lead to podocyte structural damage and loss of function, which cannot be reversed by glucocorticoid-mediated immunosuppression and result in primary steroid resistance. Clinical data show that monogenic SRNS typically manifests before the age of 5 years, responds poorly to immunosuppressive therapy (9.1% success), and increases the risk of progression to CKD by 10-fold [10,11]. In contrast, immune-mediated SRNS typically manifests in older children, responds well to B cell–targeted therapies, and has a more favorable long-term prognosis. Acquired steroid resistance is also mediated by the downregulation of glucocorticoid receptor in podocytes, mTORC1 hyperactivation, and persistent activation of pyroptosis and ferroptosis pathways, all of which lead to irreversible podocyte loss that does not respond to steroid treatment [5,9].

Within the background regulatory layer, multiple factors modulate steroid responsiveness in pediatric MCD. Genetic polymorphisms affecting the glucocorticoid receptor and steroid-metabolizing enzymes affect drug pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics. In addition, promoter hypermethylation of the glucocorticoid receptor gene may reduce its expression in immune cells and podocytes, which leads to steroid insensitivity. Emerging evidence also suggests that gut microbiota dysbiosis with reduced butyrate production impairs Treg-cell function and alters intestinal steroid absorption, which further reduces treatment response [34,37].

Complement system: a synergistic regulatory node

Complement activation through the classical, lectin, and alternative pathways results in C5b-9 membrane attack complexes that directly injure podocytes. This process serves as a key synergistic node within the MCD pathogenic network, amplifying the crosstalk between molecules involved in immune dysregulation and those involved in podocyte injury. Investigators have detected C3 and C5b-9 deposition in the glomeruli of patients with MCD, and Trachtman et al. [38] reported elevated plasma C4a and sC5b-9 levels in pediatric patients with INS during active disease. The complement system matures developmentally throughout childhood. In preschool-aged children, expression of complement regulatory proteins (CD55 and CD59) on podocytes and circulating blood cells is lower, which renders them more sensitive to complement-mediated cell injury. Preliminary data suggest that C5b-9 deposition is more extensive in the glomeruli of pediatric patients with MCD than in affected adults, but this finding must be confirmed in large, age-stratified cohorts [26,38]. In pediatric MCD, complement activation is driven primarily by the classical pathway, triggered by anti-nephrin autoantibodies and circulating immune complexes. In contrast, alternative pathway activation plays a more prominent role in adults with MCD.

Genetic/epigenetic regulation: foundation of disease

Genetic and epigenetic factors constitute the background regulatory layer of the MCD network; disease susceptibility and heterogeneity have distinct pediatric traits.

Genetic variants

Barry et al. [12] identified the rs412175 variation in the NPHS1 gene (odds ratio, 1.65) and the HLA-DQA1 haplotype (odds ratio, 3.56) as significant risk factors for pediatric SSNS. These alleles are more common among children of European ancestry than among Asian children. The effect of the HLA-DQA1 haplotype is strongest among preschool-aged children and diminishes with age, mirroring the age-related decline in MCD incidence and relapse risk. Of the patients with pediatric SRNS, 24.7% carry monogenic pathogenic variants, most commonly COL4A5 (11.2%) and NPHS2 (5.6%), which are associated with a 9.1% immune therapy response rate and 10-fold higher risk for CKD, as detailed in section 4 [10,11]. Routine genetic testing for pediatric SRNS-MCD is increasingly recommended in international guidelines. To guide global implementation, cost-effectiveness analyses are needed in low-resource settings.

Epidemiological studies have identified a 1.5–2 times higher incidence of childhood INS in boys than in girls, particularly among children younger than 10 years of age [1,3]. These sex differences likely result from multiple interacting factors. Sex hormones modulate immune cell function even in prepubertal development, X chromosome-linked genes such as COL4A5 directly influence sex differences in genetic susceptibility, and sex-related differences in drug metabolism affect treatment responses in boys and girls [10,39,40]. However, the molecular mechanisms underlying these sex-specific differences remain poorly understood, and sex should be incorporated as a biological variable in future studies to facilitate the development of truly individualized precision therapies.

Epigenetic regulation

Downregulation of Krüppel-like factor 4 (KLF4), a key podocyte transcription factor, is correlated with nephrin promoter hypermethylation, a critical epigenetic mechanism in pediatric MCD [41]. KLF4 maintains nephrin promoter accessibility, and its reduction causes DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) to be added to methylate CpG islands, which inhibits nephrin transcription [37,41]. Renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system (RAAS) activation suppresses KLF4 activity, whereas RAAS inhibitors exert an epigenetic memory effect by restoring KLF4 expression and reversing these repressive epigenetic markers. This suggests that epigenetic-based therapies have potential for treating pediatric MCD [37]. Podocyte epigenome is highly plastic during kidney development. Dynamic DNA methylation patterns are more susceptible to environmental modulation (e.g., infection, diet, and drug exposure) in children than in adults. Serum levels of members of the miR-30 family and urinary levels of miR-30a-5p fluctuate with disease activity in pediatric MCD; thus, they have potential as biomarkers of disease activity that can be measured noninvasively [42].

Environmental triggers: external modulators

Interactions between the gut microbiota and diet, mediated via the gut–kidney axis, are key modulators of pediatric MCD and constitute a key component of the background regulatory layer. Owing to the low diversity and high plasticity of the developing pediatric gut microbiota, the gut is highly sensitive to dietary changes and environmental perturbations. Butyrate-producing bacteria (Faecalibacterium and Roseburia species) are 40%–60% less abundant in pediatric patients with MCD than in healthy controls. Consequently, fecal butyrate levels in patients (2.1 mmol/L) are significantly lower than those in healthy controls (5.3 mmol/L) [43]. Butyrate enhances Treg-cell function by activating calcineurin–nuclear factor of activated T cells to promote FOXP3 nuclear translocation, and by inhibiting HDAC1/3 (histone deacetylase 1 [HDAC1] and histone deacetylase 3 [HDAC3]) to enhance FOXP3 transcription. When butyrate levels are insufficient, Treg cell–derived IL-10 levels are 35% lower than normal in pediatric patients with MCD [43,44]. Akkermansia muciniphila abundance is negatively correlated with proteinuria level (r=–0.42, P<0.01) and may inhibit EFOB cell–derived IL-13 secretion through fucose-derived metabolites, although the exact mechanism remains to be fully elucidated [43]. Gut microbiota is assembled during the first 3 years of life, and disruptions during this period (e.g., by antibiotic exposure, cesarean delivery, and formula feeding) are associated with an increased risk of subsequent MCD development, a mechanism unique to the pediatric population.

Systemic inflammatory triggers, particularly infections, are the most common factors precipitating new-onset and relapses of pediatric MCD. More than 60% of relapses in children are preceded by an infection [1]. Viral and bacterial infections activate innate immune cells, destroy immune tolerance, and exacerbate adaptive immune dysregulation via the gut–kidney axis [2,43]. Vaccination is a rare trigger of MCD relapse, and the absolute risk of MCD flare after vaccination is extremely low. The benefits of routine vaccination in preventing severe infectious diseases (which are far more common triggers of relapse) far outweigh the theoretical risk of vaccination, in accordance with international clinical guidelines [2].

Summary and outlook

Core advances

Since 2015, research on the pathogenesis of childhood MCD has been reconceptualized. The long-standing “single T-cell defect” theory has been replaced by a coordinated T-cell/B-cell dysregulation model that has been validated in multicenter pediatric clinical cohort studies. The core pathogenic elements of this model include Treg-cell functional immaturity, activation of the TFH-cell/EFOB-cell axis, and the development of anti-nephrin autoantibodies. These discoveries have provided clear, actionable targets for B cell–targeted immunotherapies in children. These mechanistic insights have helped identify multiple actionable therapeutic targets across the three-layer pathogenic network (Table 2). In addition, several key emerging mechanistic insights with promising preclinical and preliminary pediatric clinical evidence have reshaped clinicians’ understanding of the disease. First, pyroptosis and ferroptosis, with mutual reinforcement via the IL-18–TFRC axis and the C5b-9–SLC7A11 axis, are key execution pathways of podocyte injury in pediatric MCD. Second, genetic susceptibility (presence of HLA-DQA1 or COL4A5), epigenetic regulation (KLF4–DNMT1 axis), and the gut–kidney axis (butyrate–HDAC–FOXP3 pathway) are key modulators of the disease network. The entire pathogenic network is inherently governed by pediatric development. The immaturity of the immune system and the biological characteristics of developing podocytes profoundly shape disease manifestations, treatment responsiveness, and long-term outcomes in childhood MCD.

Key therapeutic targets in the three-layer pathogenic network of childhood minimal change disease

Future directions

In future research, investigators should prioritize three core directions: (1) resolving inconsistencies in anti-nephrin antibody prevalence through the development of standardized detection assays and age-stratified multicenter pediatric studies; (2) validating multimodal biomarker panels integrating immune, epigenetic, and urinary podocyte injury markers to distinguish SSNS, SRNS, and frequent relapsing INS across different pediatric age groups; and (3) developing pediatric-specific targeted therapies, prioritizing agents with minimal effects on growth and immune development. In summary, clinicians’ understanding of MCD has evolved from a simplistic single-link dysregulation model to a sophisticated, multilayered pathogenic network. Future interdisciplinary research integrating developmental biology, immunology, and epigenetics will advance treatment beyond symptom control to mechanism-based cures for children affected by this disease.

Notes

Conflicts of interest

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Funding

None.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank all the researchers whose work has been cited in this review. The DeepSeek large language model (DeepSeek-V2, developed by DeepSeek Inc., Hangzhou, China) was used for initial manuscript drafting and language polishing. All content in the manuscript has been critically reviewed, extensively revised, and verified for academic accuracy, clinical relevance, and originality by the authors. The authors take full responsibility for the content of this manuscript.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: ZZ

Data curation: ZZ

Visualization: ZZ

Supervision: LY

Writing–original draft: ZZ

Writing–review & editing: LY

All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data availability statement

Data sharing is not applicable as no new data were created or analyzed in this study.

References

1. Vivarelli M, Gibson K, Sinha A, Boyer O. Childhood nephrotic syndrome. Lancet 2023;402:809–24. 10.1016/s0140-6736(23)01051-6. 37659779.
2. Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) Nephrotic Syndrome in Children Work Group, Floege J, Gibson KL, Vivarelli M, Liew A, Radhakrishnan J, et al. KDIGO 2025 clinical practice guideline for the management of nephrotic syndrome in children. Kidney Int 2025;107:S241–89. 10.1016/j.kint.2024.11.007. 40254391.
3. Noone DG, Iijima K, Parekh R. Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children. Lancet 2018;392:61–74. 10.1016/s0140-6736(18)30536-1. 29910038.
4. Tsuji S, Akagawa S, Akagawa Y, Yamaguchi T, Kino J, Yamanouchi S, et al. Idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children: role of regulatory T cells and gut microbiota. Pediatr Res 2021;89:1185–91. 10.1038/s41390-020-1022-3. 32570267.
5. Braun F, Mandel AM, Blomberg L, Wong MN, Chatzinikolaou G, Meyer DH, et al. Loss of genome maintenance is linked to mTOR complex 1 signaling and accelerates podocyte damage. JCI Insight 2025;10e172370. 10.1172/jci.insight.172370. 40392611.
6. Yang X, Man C, Tang X, Li T, Yang X, Wang M, et al. The disturbance and clinical significance of B cell and circulating follicular helper T cell subsets in children with primary nephrotic syndrome. Immunol Lett 2021;238:32–9. 10.1016/j.imlet.2021.07.006. 34310986.
7. Zhong S, Wang N, Zhang C. Podocyte death in diabetic kidney disease: potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets. Int J Mol Sci 2024;25:9035. 10.3390/ijms25169035. 39201721.
8. Liao Y, Hu H, Wan Q, Song H. The role of B lymphocyte subsets in nephrotic syndrome: functions, mechanisms, clinical significance and future perspectives. Front Immunol 2025;16:1598197. 10.3389/fimmu.2025.1598197. 40852718.
9. Kajio Y, Suzuki T, Kobayashi K, Kanazawa N, Iyoda M, Honda H, et al. Activation of the inflammasome and pyroptosis cascade in podocytes of patients with minimal change disease. Clin Kidney J 2024;17:sfae216. 10.1093/ckj/sfae216. 39114498.
10. Li S, Hu M, He C, Sun Y, Huang W, Lei F, et al. A multicenter study investigating the genetic analysis of childhood steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome: variants in COL4A5 may not be coincidental. PLoS One 2024;19e0304864. 10.1371/journal.pone.0304864. 39625990.
11. Chen G, Zeng M, Liu Z, Zhou M, Zha J, Zhang L, et al. The kinetics of mTORC1 activation associates with FOXP3 expression pattern of CD4+ T cells and outcome of steroid-sensitive minimal change disease. Int Immunopharmacol 2023;122:110589. 10.1016/j.intimp.2023.110589. 37418986.
12. Barry A, McNulty MT, Jia X, Gupta Y, Debiec H, Luo Y, et al. Multi-population genome-wide association study implicates immune and non-immune factors in pediatric steroid-sensitive nephrotic syndrome. Nat Commun 2023;14:2481. 10.1038/s41467-023-37985-w. 37120605.
13. Colucci M, Angeletti A, Zotta F, Carsetti R, Lugani F, Rava L, et al. Age and memory B cells at baseline are associated with risk of relapse and memory B-cell reappearance following anti-CD20 treatment in pediatric frequently-relapsing/steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome. Kidney Int 2023;104:577–86. 10.1016/j.kint.2023.06.013. 37385541.
14. Chan CY, Teo S, Lu L, Chan YH, Lau PY, Than M, et al. Low regulatory T-cells: a distinct immunological subgroup in minimal change nephrotic syndrome with early relapse following rituximab therapy. Transl Res 2021;235:48–61. 10.1016/j.trsl.2021.03.019. 33812063.
15. Zhu H, Sun J, Yan Y, Liu P, Huang Y. Immune podocyte injury in autoimmune glomerular diseases. Front Immunol 2026;17:1804416. 10.3389/fimmu.2026.1804416. 41939877.
16. Taniguchi T. The role of follicular helper T cells in the pathogenesis of allergic disease-related minimal change nephrotic syndrome. CEN Case Rep 2024;13:74–5. 10.1007/s13730-023-00796-5. 37155082.
17. Saleh MA, Shaaban AA, Talaat IM, Elmougy A, Adra SF, Ahmad F, et al. RhoA/ROCK inhibition attenuates endothelin-1-induced glomerulopathy in the rats. Life Sci 2023;323:121687. 10.1016/j.lfs.2023.121687. 37030613.
18. Tsuji S, Yamaguchi T, Akagawa Y, Akagawa S, Yamanouchi S, Kimata T, et al. Significance of regulatory T cells in children with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. J Nephrol 2022;35:711–3. 10.1007/s40620-021-01201-z. 35089537.
19. Kaczmarski M. Allergy to cow’s milk proteins and other allergens: an unrecognized co-factor of idiopathic nephrotic syndrome in children or a factor interfering with the treatment of this disease?: a case report. Reports (MDPI) 2023;6:25. 10.3390/reports6020025. 40729192.
20. Nell D, Wolf R, Podgorny PM, Kuschnereit T, Kuschnereit R, Dabers T, et al. Complement activation in nephrotic glomerular diseases. Biomedicines 2024;12:455. 10.3390/biomedicines12020455. 38398059.
21. Raglianti V, Angelotti ML, Cirillo L, Ravaglia F, Landini S, Palazzo V, et al. Anti-slit diaphragm antibodies on kidney biopsy identify pediatric patients with steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome responsive to second-line immunosuppressants. Kidney Int 2024;106:1124–34. 10.1016/j.kint.2024.09.006. 39368741.
22. Watts AJ, Keller KH, Lerner G, Rosales I, Collins AB, Sekulic M, et al. Discovery of autoantibodies targeting nephrin in minimal change disease supports a novel autoimmune etiology. J Am Soc Nephrol 2022;33:238–52. 10.3410/f.741110689.793592337. 34732507.
23. Hengel FE, Dehde S, Lasse M, Zahner G, Seifert L, Schnarre A, et al. Autoantibodies targeting nephrin in podocytopathies. N Engl J Med 2024;391:422–33. 10.1056/nejmoa2314471. 38804512.
24. Ichikawa Y, Sakakibara N, Aoyama S, Kimura Y, Inoki Y, Tanaka Y, et al. Co-localization of IgG with nephrin in immune-mediated idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Clin Exp Nephrol 2025;29:1821–8. 10.1007/s10157-025-02741-5. 40768127.
25. Shirai Y, Miura K, Ishizuka K, Ando T, Kanda S, Hashimoto J, et al. A multi-institutional study found a possible role of anti-nephrin antibodies in post-transplant focal segmental glomerulosclerosis recurrence. Kidney Int 2024;105:608–17. 10.1016/j.kint.2023.11.022. 38110152.
26. Chan EY, Yu EL, Angeletti A, Arslan Z, Basu B, Boyer O, et al. Long-term efficacy and safety of repeated rituximab to maintain remission in idiopathic childhood nephrotic syndrome: an international study. J Am Soc Nephrol 2022;33:1193–207. 10.1681/asn.2021111472. 35354600.
27. Chen Q, Jiang H, Ding R, Zhong J, Li L, Wan J, et al. Cell-type-specific molecular characterization of cells from circulation and kidney in IgA nephropathy with nephrotic syndrome. Front Immunol 2023;14:1231937. 10.3389/fimmu.2023.1231937. 37908345.
28. Kim SH, Park SJ, Han KH, Kronbichler A, Saleem MA, Oh J, et al. Pathogenesis of minimal change nephrotic syndrome: an immunological concept. Korean J Pediatr 2016;59:205–11. 10.3345/kjp.2016.59.5.205. 27279884.
29. Kanazawa N, Iyoda M, Suzuki T, Tachibana S, Nagashima R, Honda H. Exploring the significance of interleukin-33/ST2 axis in minimal change disease. Sci Rep 2023;13:18776. 10.1038/s41598-023-45678-z. 37907612.
30. Katafuchi E, Hisano S, Kurata S, Muta K, Uesugi N, Miyamoto T, et al. Aberrant localization of b1 integrin in podocyte cytoplasm of primary FSGS with cellular lesion. Virchows Arch 2025;486:1049–59. 10.1007/s00428-024-03919-0. 39271482.
31. Liu L, Li Q, Zhang G. Systemic inflammation accelerates the development of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis in a mouse model of adriamycin induced nephrosis. Sci Rep 2025;15:14304. 10.1038/s41598-025-96125-0. 40274873.
32. Shen X, Wang H, Weng C, He Y, Shao X, Le J, et al. Angiopoietin-like 4 exacerbates renal tubular epithelial cell pyroptosis in acute kidney injury via integrin b5/FAK signaling pathway. Kidney Int 2025;108:1073–87. 10.1016/j.kint.2025.07.025. 40850618.
33. Sever S. Role of actin cytoskeleton in podocytes. Pediatr Nephrol 2021;36:2607–14. 10.1007/s00467-020-04812-z. 33188449.
34. Liang T, Qi C, Lai Y, Xie J, Wang H, Zhang L, et al. HDAC6-mediated a-tubulin deacetylation suppresses autophagy and enhances motility of podocytes in diabetic nephropathy. J Cell Mol Med 2020;24:11558–72. 10.1111/jcmm.15772. 32885602.
35. Hu H, Liang W, Ding G. Podocyte metabolic reprogramming and targeted therapy. J Am Soc Nephrol 2026;37:619–33. 10.1681/asn.0000000917. 41082318.
36. Nishimura Y. Podocytes in health and disease: from development to regeneration. Hum Cell 2025;38:169. 10.1007/s13577-025-01296-7. 41037130.
37. Hayashi K. Targeting DNA methylation in podocytes to overcome chronic kidney disease. Keio J Med 2023;72:67–76. 10.2302/kjm.2022-0017-ir. 37271519.
38. Trachtman H, Laskowski J, Lee C, Renner B, Feemster A, Parikh S, et al. Natural antibody and complement activation characterize patients with idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Am J Physiol Renal Physiol 2021;321:F505–16. 10.1152/ajprenal.00041.2021. 34459222.
39. Robinson GA, Peng J, Peckham H, Butler G, Pineda-Torra I, Ciurtin C, et al. Investigating sex differences in T regulatory cells from cisgender and transgender healthy individuals and patients with autoimmune inflammatory disease: a cross-sectional study. Lancet Rheumatol 2022;4:e710–24. 10.1016/s2665-9913(22)00198-9. 36353692.
40. Faghihi T, Assadi F. Sex differences on the pharmacokinetics of drugs for children with chronic kidney disease: a narrative review. Adv Pharm Bull 2024;14:537–42. 10.34172/apb.2024.056. 39494256.
41. Hayashi K. Altered DNA methylation in kidney disease: useful markers and therapeutic targets. Clin Exp Nephrol 2022;26:309–15. 10.1007/s10157-022-02181-5. 35024974.
42. Hayward S, Parmesar K, Welsh GI, Suderman M, Saleem MA. Epigenetic mechanisms and nephrotic syndrome: a systematic review. Biomedicines 2023;11:514. 10.3390/biomedicines11020514. 36831050.
43. Kaneko K. Gut dysbiosis as a susceptibility factor in childhood idiopathic nephrotic syndrome. Pediatr Neonatol 2025;66 Suppl 1:S2–7. 10.1016/j.pedneo.2024.10.003. 39521679.
44. Uy N, Graf L, Lemley KV, Kaskel F. Effects of gluten-free, dairy-free diet on childhood nephrotic syndrome and gut microbiota. Pediatr Res 2015;77:252–5. 10.1038/pr.2014.159. 25310757.

Article information Continued

Fig. 1.

Multidimensional network model of childhood minimal change disease pathogenesis. This model is structured around two core interconnected functional modules, with its overall activity fine-tuned by cross-cutting developmental and background regulatory factors. (A) Driver layer (immune dysregulation), in which genetic susceptibility and environmental triggers collectively induce immune dysregulation, manifested as regulatory T cell defects, EFOB cell-T follicular helper cell activation, and pathogenic autoantibody production. These immune cells secrete cytokines (IL-13 and TNF-α) that act on podocytes. (B) Execution layer (podocyte injury), in which podocytes serve as core targets and signal integrators, and damage occurs via podocyte foot process fusion, cytoskeletal remodeling, pyroptosis, and ferroptosis. Extensive crosstalk exists between all mechanisms, such as autoantibody-mediated complement activation and mutual promotion between pyroptosis and ferroptosis. The entire network is inherently influenced by pediatric developmental specificity; its overall activity is modulated by genetic/epigenetic factors and gut microbiota-diet interactions that shape immune status and podocyte vulnerability. HLA-DQA1, human leukocyte antigen DQA1; NLRP3, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor pyrin domain-containing 3; EFOB, extrafollicular B; IL, interleukin; TNF, tumor necrosis factor; C5a, complement fragment 5a; C5b-9, complement membrane attack complex C5b-9; RhoA, Ras homolog family member A; ROCK, Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase; HDAC6, histone deacetylase 6; GSDMD, gasdermin D; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; SLC7A11, solute carrier family 7 member 11.

Fig. 2.

Bidirectional crosstalk between immune cell subsets and podocytes in childhood minimal change disease. This schematic diagram shows the core signaling interactions between adaptive immune cells (Treg cells, TFH cells, EFOB cell/memory B cells), innate immune cells (macrophages, pDCs, type 2 innate lymphoid cells), and podocytes. Immune cells secrete pathogenic cytokines and autoantibodies to induce podocyte injury, and injured podocytes release DAMPs and proinflammatory factors to recruit and activate immune cells; this process results in a vicious cycle of immune activation and podocyte injury. Treg, regulatory T; TFH, T-follicular helper; EFOB, extrafollicular B; IL, interleukin; TNF-α, tumor necrosis factor alpha; pDCs, plasmacytoid dendritic cells; DAMPs, damage-associated molecular patterns.

Table 1.

Key differences between childhood and adulthood MCD

Dimension Childhood MCD (1–18 years) Adult MCD (>18 years) Key references
Epidemiology >85% of INS in 1–12 years old; incidence 2–7/100,000; male predominance (1.5–2:1) 10%–25% of adult INS; incidence 1/100,000; slight female predominance [1,3]
Clinical course 80%–90% initial steroid response; 55%–60% develop frequent relapses/steroid dependence 70%–80% initial steroid response; 30%–40% relapse rate; a higher risk of irreversible renal decline [1,2]
Immune features Immature regulatory circuits; lower Treg immunosuppressive capacity; higher ILC2/DC activity in early life Mature immune system; more heterogeneous phenotypes; weaker atopy association [4-6]
Podocyte biology Higher regenerative capacity; higher cytokine sensitivity; age-dependent cell death susceptibility Limited regenerative capacity; a higher risk of irreversible podocyte loss [7-9]
Genetic susceptibility Approximately 25% monogenic variants in SRNS; strong HLA association <10% monogenic variants in adult SRNS; weaker HLA association [10-12]
Treatment response Better response to rituximab; longer remission duration; a higher risk of steroid-related growth impairment Poorer rituximab response in many cases; higher adverse event risk in elderly [2,13]

MCD, minimal change disease; INS, idiopathic nephrotic syndrome; Treg, regulatory T; ILC2/DC, type 2 innate lymphoid cell/dendritic cell; SRNS, steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome; HLA, human leukocyte antigen.

Table 2.

Key therapeutic targets in the three-layer pathogenic network of childhood minimal change disease

Network layer Core pathogenic mechanism Key therapeutic targets Representative agents
Driver layer (immune dysregulation) Treg functional deficiency mTORC1, FOXP3, HDAC1/3 Sirolimus, butyrate supplements, HDAC1/3 inhibitors
TFH-EFOB cell activation CD20, BAFF/APRIL, ICOS-ICOSL Rituximab, ofatumumab, belimumab
Anti-nephrin autoantibodies B cell depletion, autoantibody clearance Rituximab, plasma exchange
Innate immune cell activation IL-13, IL-4, type I interferon Anti-IL-13 antibodies, JAK inhibitors
Execution layer (podocyte injury) Cytoskeletal remodeling RhoA/ROCK, HDAC6 Fasudil, Tubastatin A
Podocyte pyroptosis NLRP3, IL-1β NLRP3 inhibitors, IL-1 receptor antagonists
Podocyte ferroptosis GPX4, Nrf2, TFRC Ferrostatin-1, Nrf2 agonists
mTORC1 hyperactivation mTORC1 Sirolimus, everolimus
Background regulatory layer Nephrin promoter hypermethylation DNMT1, KLF4 DNMT inhibitors, KLF4 agonists
Gut microbiota dysbiosis Gut microbiota, HDAC1/3 Butyrate supplements, probiotics
Monogenic podocyte defects RAAS pathway RAAS inhibitors, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists

mTORC1, mechanistic target of rapamycin complex 1; FOXP3, forkhead box P3; HDAC1/3, histone deacetylase 1/3; TFH, T-follicular helper; EFOB, extrafollicular B; CD20, cluster of differentiation 20; BAFF/APRIL, B-cell activating factor/a proliferation-inducing ligand; ICOS-ICOSL, inducible T-cell co-stimulator-inducible T-cell co-stimulator ligand; IL, interleukin; JAK, Janus kinase; RhoA/ROCK, Ras homolog family member A/Rho-associated coiled-coil containing protein kinase; HDAC6, histone deacetylase 6; NLRP3, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain (NOD)-like receptor family pyrin domain-containing 3; GPX4, glutathione peroxidase 4; Nrf2, nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2; TFRC, transferrin receptor; DNMT1, DNA methyltransferase 1; KLF4, Krüppel-like factor 4; RAAS, renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.